Breakthroughs Blog: Access

Interested in more global health innovation news? Every week GHTC scours media reports worldwide to deliver essential global health R&D news and content to your inbox. Sign up now to receive our weekly R&D News Roundup email. As the dengue outbreak in Latin America has continued to grow and the threat of dengue continues to rise globally due to climate change, better and cheaper vaccines are on the horizon but are unlikely to be available soon enough to address the current crises. Currently approved vaccines for dengue include one expensive two-shot regimen and one that can only be given to people who have already been infected. A new, single-dose vaccine designed to target all four strains of the dengue virus, which was created by the US National Institutes of Health and licensed for development by the Brazilian Instituto Butantan, provided strong protection in a Phase 3 trial. The institute plans to submit the vaccine to Brazil’s regulatory agency for approval within the next few months, and if approved, the institute could start producing tens of million doses next year. Merck also licensed the vaccine technology and is developing a related vaccine for the rest of the world but has yet to test it in a clinical trial. In the meantime, the Brazilian government bought global supply of Takeda’s Qdenga vaccine, which, at a steep per-dose price, will provide some protection during the current outbreak. Takeda’s vaccine has also been licensed to an Indian generic drugmaker, but a slow start-up process means that is unlikely to be available before 2030.Pfizer recently announced that its RSV vaccine demonstrated the potential to protect adults between 18 and 50 at high risk of severe illness in a late-stage clinical trial, offering the promise of a tool to protect a far broader population against the virus that not only causes thousands of hospitalizations and deaths among older Americans and hundreds among infants every year but also can also cause severe illness in younger adults with weakened immune systems or underlying chronic conditions. Abrysvo is currently approved in the United States and elsewhere for adults 60 and older and expectant mothers. Pfizer announced plans to submit the final results from the trial for expanded approval of Abrysvo, although a timeline for submission has not yet been disclosed. Last fall, GSK released late-stage trial data demonstrating that its RSV vaccine could protect adults between 50 and 59 years old, and the US Food and Drug Administration is expected to make its decision on that vaccine in June.A research team from the Centre for Clinical Microbiology at University College London has developed a new method for testing tuberculosis (TB) that would allow lower-resourced laboratories in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to process samples safely, with the method primarily aimed at use for monitoring drug treatment response and clinical trials. The World Health Organization recommends monthly treatment monitoring with sputum culture to ensure patients are adhering to treatment to reduce the emergence of multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant TB, but monitoring with culture is often unavailable or incredibly slow in LMICs. The new method cuts out the need for a culture; uses common instrumentation available in most laboratories, even in LMICS; does not have high energy requirements; and takes only three or four hours to return a result. The method is already being used in clinical studies.

Interested in more global health innovation news? Every week GHTC scours media reports worldwide to deliver essential global health R&D news and content to your inbox. Sign up now to receive our weekly R&D News Roundup email. The International Vaccine Institute (IVI) has initiated a technology transfer, first announced last year, of the simplified Oral Cholera Vaccine (OCV-S) to Indian company Biological E. Limited. In the face of an unprecedented rise in cholera outbreaks around the world in recent years, the technology transfer aims to increase the volume of affordable cholera vaccines in the Indian and international markets. IVI is providing technical information, know-how, and materials to support clinical development and regulatory approvals of the vaccine. OCV-s is a simplified formulation of the Oral Cholera Vaccine that can lower production costs while increasing capacity for manufacturers.The Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute last week announced the launch of a Phase 3 trial evaluating a vaccine for tuberculosis (TB), which researchers hope could become the second licensed vaccine for TB in more than 100 years. The adjuvanted subunit vaccine M72/AS01E was originally developed by GSK, Aeras, and IAVI. The trial, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust, is testing the vaccine’s ability to prevent latent TB from progressing to active pulmonary TB in adults and adolescents. If successful, the pivotal trial could lead to a new tool with the potential to transform TB control globally.A research team from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine has identified drug candidates that demonstrate the potential to eliminate the HIV viral reservoir that cannot be expelled completely by existing antiretroviral drugs, preventing people who have undetectable viral load from being completely cured of HIV. The drug candidates, which are called proteolysis targeting chimeras, or PROTACs, can trigger the degradation of the viral protein that prevents the immune system from destroying infected cells by hiding signs of the virus on the surface of the cell. Through this method, the drugs show promise in reversing the ability of HIV to evade detection by the immune system. The PROTAC approach still has significant hurdles to go before it can be used in humans, including preclinical testing in animal models and medical chemistry optimization.

A new report launched at Davos, from the World Economic Forum and the McKinsey Health Institute, refocused the spotlight on women’s health back in January. The report found a stark gap in health between women and men, adding up to 75 million years of life lost annually due to poor health or early death. This health gap is incredibly costly—closing it would benefit 3.9 billion women and would boost the global economy by $1 trillion by 2040 due to reductions in early deaths and health conditions, as well as the greater capacity for women to make socioeconomic contributions.In recognition of International Women’s Day, GHTC is spotlighting technologies, both available and still in development, that could help close the gender health gap and move us toward gender equity by both addressing the leading causes of morbidity and mortality for women and girls and empowering them to take control of their health and future. 1. CAB-LA and the dapivirine ring for HIV preventionHIV remains a major global challenge, especially for women and girls, who account for more than half of the 37.7 million people living with HIV and 46 percent of new infections in 2022. While the introduction of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has helped drive significant declines in HIV infections globally, challenges adhering to the regimen of daily pills, as well as issues of stigma, have limited its impact in certain populations, including adolescent girls and young women. Long-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA), developed by ViiV Healthcare, is a HIV prevention option administered by injection once every two months. CAB-LA offers an option that for many is easier to consistently use and also more discreet to receive than daily oral PrEP, which can reduce a barrier to use for those who fear stigmatization if their HIV status is exposed.The dapivirine ring, developed by the nonprofit International Partnership for Microbicides, is a flexible silicone ring inserted in the vagina that slowly releases the antiretroviral medication dapivirine over one month to reduce the risk of HIV infection. The ring offers an alternative discreet, user-controlled prevention option for women at high risk of HIV who are unable or prefer not to use other prevention methods.2. HPV vaccine and self-sampling for cervical cancer prevention and treatmentCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women globally, but 90 percent of deaths from cervical cancer and more than 80 percent of cases occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is mostly due to lack of access to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination (nine out of every ten cases of cervical cancer are caused by persistent HPV infection) and cervical screening and treatment services. Ensuring girls and women have access to HPV vaccines and testing can help to address the persistently high burden of preventable HPV cases and cervical cancer deaths.As of 2023, there are six vaccines for HPV available globally, which all protect against the highest-risk types of HPV that cause the most cervical cancers. While there have been many studies demonstrating the safety and efficacy of HPV vaccines, a new study published in January of 2024, which was the first to monitor a national cohort of women over a significantly long period of time (the study looks at women born between 1988 and 1996), found zero cases of cervical cancer—reinforcing HPV vaccines as a lifesaving tool that has and will continue to be a game changer for women’s health. Regular screenings for cervical cancer are globally recommended and are crucial because cervical cancer can be cured if diagnosed and treated early on. Yet 67 percent of women between 20 and 70 have never been screened for cervical cancer (by HPV or other tests). HPV self-sampling, an approach recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for women 30 to 60, has been shown to be about as reliable as sampling by health care providers. Additionally, it has also been shown to nearly double use of cervical cancer screening services because it offers privacy and convenience, requires little time and effort, and reduces any embarrassment, pain, or anxiety that may be associated with sampling done by health workers. 3. Next-generation contraceptivesAn estimated 257 million people globally who want to avoid pregnancy are not using safe, modern methods of contraception, leading to unintended pregnancies and then unsafe abortions, which cause up to 13 percent of all maternal deaths. Unacceptable or unsuitable contraception options are one of the leading causes of unintended pregnancy. An estimated 40 percent of women in LMICs who use a contraceptive stop within a year because of challenges, including side effects, the burden of sticking to a daily regimen, and the time and monetary cost of having to travel, sometimes far distances, to get new prescriptions. Introduction of the daily oral birth control pill helped contribute to a major increase in contraceptive use globally over the past 50 years, but contraception technology has not seen major innovations in generations, and the field is deeply underfunded, highlighting the need for new, less burdensome contraceptive options.Lyndra Therapeutics is developing a once-monthly contraceptive pill, currently in preclinical development, that could serve as one such alternative. Researchers are also developing longer-acting injectable contraceptive products, including a six-month injectable contraceptive being advanced by FHI 360. Microarray patches are another novel contraceptive option in early-stage development—they work by releasing hormones over several months and are discreet and easy to use at home. Contraception, and specifically access to a variety of contraceptive options that fit varying needs, allows women and girls to have autonomy over their bodies and lives. There remains a gap in further research into nonhormonal contraceptive options that cause fewer uncomfortable side effects or contraceptives for men that take the burden off of women.4. AI-enabled ultrasoundsAlmost 800 women died from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth every day in 2020. While there are many contributing factors, one significant challenge is lack of access to diagnostic tools like ultrasounds. Fifty percent of women in LMICs received no ultrasound scans during the course of their pregnancy. Even where ultrasounds are available, they are usually bulky, expensive, and require specializing training or knowledge to operate, forcing patients to travel to specific health care facilities to access them. New technologies like Philip’s Lumify Handheld Ultrasound, which can be connected to a mobile device, offer a more compact, portable option in emergency situations or in low-resource settings when traditional ultrasounds are not available or are not feasible. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding Philips to accelerate the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms that can be used with the scanner to simplify the identification of key pregnancy abnormalities, with results already showing that the AI-enabled technology helped to improve informed decision-making in the care of pregnant women in rural, underserved communities. Nimble, compact technologies like this ensure that more women have access to basic, lifesaving technologies and that women, along with their health care providers, can make informed decisions about their health and pregnancy, reducing the likelihood of death from preventable causes.5. Postpartum bleeding solutionsPostpartum hemorrhage (PPH), or excessive bleeding after childbirth, is the world’s leading cause of maternal death and can lead to lasting disability and psychological trauma, despite being preventable and treatable. Adolescent pregnancies carry a higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage because adolescent uteruses are not fully developed enough to sustain a healthy pregnancy—pregnancy complications, as well as unsafe abortions, are the leading cause of death among 15- to 19-year-old girls globally.PATH and Sinapi developed a technology, called the Ellavi uterine balloon tamponade, which builds on a low-cost solution some health care providers had been using to combat PPH called a “condom catheter,” which uses items commonly found and self-assembled in a clinic to insert a condom into the uterus and then fill it with water to exert pressure on the uterine walls and stop the flow of blood. The Ellavi device was optimized to be a high-quality, simple-to-manufacture and -use, and affordable version of the “condom catheter” that could be deployed globally to save even more lives. Another simple, inexpensive solution to PPH comes in the form of a plastic sheet with a pouch to collect and measure the volume of blood loss. This tool helps health care providers better recognize when women are in danger and take action. In one large-scale study in Africa, this sheet, when used in combination with other WHO-recommended treatment options for PPH, reduced the number of women experiencing severe bleeding by 60 percent and also reduced the number of deaths from PPH.These innovative but simple and low-cost technologies are not moneymakers, but they can greatly reduce preventable maternal deaths, particularly among adolescents, illustrating a paradox in women’s health—the gap persists because many technologies that could have a tremendous impact, particularly in LMICs, do not necessarily yield the greatest profit.While these five solutions highlighted have the potential to save lives and empower women, it is clear that closing the cavernous gender gap in health will require many more new tools and improved access to existing ones. Greater investment in R&D for conditions that specifically affect women and girls and expanded roles for women and girls to engage and lead across the R&D sector can help ensure more breakthroughs are realized in our lifetimes and that resulting tools are designed with the diverse needs of women and girls in mind.

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 1 billion vaccine doses were delivered to the world’s poorest countries via the World Health Organization (WHO)-backed COVAX vaccine sharing scheme. While much attention has gone to evaluating the successes and shortcomings of this effort in the wake of the pandemic, far less has been directed towards the WHO program that helped facilitate the introduction of these vaccines and other technologies by certifying their safety and efficacy—a program that deserves equally nuanced examination.  For decades, the WHO prequalification (PQ) program has played an essential role in accelerating access to health products in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by reviewing their safety, efficacy, and quality. It is a stamp of approval that clears the way for multilateral agencies to procure drugs, vaccines, diagnostics, and vector control products, and it guides emerging regulatory agencies that might otherwise lack the capacity to conduct independent reviews. But despite the program’s critical role in the global health ecosystem, it has been plagued by both operational and procedural challenges that create unnecessary delays. External stakeholders highlight pain points in the PQ programThat paradox is on full display in an independent evaluation released last fall of the WHO Department of Regulation and Prequalification, which oversees the PQ program. The assessment lauds the PQ program’s successes in expanding global access to products, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, it also highlights the need for increased communication and collaboration between the PQ department and key stakeholders in the public health ecosystem, including product developers, national regulatory authorities, procurers, and other WHO departments. It also notes how manufacturers who apply for PQ are especially keen to have more visibility into PQ decision timelines and roadmaps for the release of related technical standards and guidelines. Stakeholders also unanimously highlighted the limited resourcing at WHO headquarters as a key constraint across the PQ department. According to the evaluation, the department’s resources have remained stable between 2018 and 2022 (from 114 staff members in December 2019 to 115 in December 2022). However, the scope and the workload across all teams have increased substantially over the same period. This assessment echoes recommendations from a 2022 report from GHTC and the Duke Global Health Innovation Center, which also urged PQ to increase visibility into anticipated timelines for decision gates throughout the review process so developers can better anticipate communication and decision-making. The report also recommended that the PQ program be more transparent in publicly disclosing information on how it is performing against these targets, as well as provide access to regularly updated public databases with complete milestone information on all prequalified products. Moving towards greater efficiency and transparency Fortunately, recent moves by WHO suggest the agency is beginning to take this feedback seriously and pursue remedies. Alongside the release of the evaluation, WHO announced the forthcoming launch of a new electronic portal for processing PQ applications. The portal promises a one-stop shop for applicants to file applications and relevant documents, receive status notifications, and track and respond to requests—offering them a real-time picture of their application status. This portal should also drive major efficiency improvements, as applications are currently processed manually, meaning that WHO staff handled the more than 1,000 PQ applications received in 2022 without automated support mechanisms. For national regulatory agencies, particularly those involved in WHO’s Collaborative Registration Processes—which allow for regulators to rely on evaluations carried out by WHO and other participating stringent regulatory authorities to accelerate their regulatory decision-making—, the portal provides a single location where they can also access all relevant information and documents in tandem with WHO. Importantly, the portal will also capture process-related milestones in greater detail and integrate with the WHO website, which we hope will allow PQ to improve reporting and transparency. While, unfortunately, the intended January 2024 launch of the portal has been delayed to the second quarter of the year, the rollout of the portal should be a welcome step toward a more effective, efficient, and transparent PQ program. A new path forward for novel products?Alongside pursuing operational improvements to processing applications, it is also vital that WHO reevaluate the PQ process itself to ameliorate bottlenecks that delay access to critically needed new technologies. Our 2022 report identified the interplay between the PQ process and the release of WHO treatment and use guidelines as one such process area ripe for change. Currently, WHO PQ procedure states that before a product can complete the PQ process and be listed, the product must already be featured in published WHO policy guidelines that recommend its use in clinical practice or public health policy. Stakeholders with whom we spoke identified this sequence as an obstacle and a source of delay for the PQ of novel products since the committees that develop guidelines, which operate outside the PQ process, will not release them until the clinical data upon which the guidelines are based are formally published in peer-reviewed literature, which can often take some time. During the COVID-19 pandemic, WHO proved these functions could occur more flexibly and in parallel. For example, WHO released regularly updated “living guidelines” for COVID-19 therapeutics as new clinical evidence emerged and, in 2022, released interim guidance for novel shorter-course treatments for drug-resistant tuberculosis. WHO PQ also initiated and advanced PQ review of the COVID-19 antiviral known by the brand name Paxlovid before related guidance was released, ultimately announcing the PQ of the product on the same day as the living guidelines for COVID-19 therapeutics were updated to recommend its use. There is an opportunity for WHO to more broadly adopt lessons from this experience by both expanding the use of interim or living guidelines and redefining the process for prequalifying novel products so PQ and guidelines development can occur more in parallel. We hope PQ will pursue this opportunity with haste, as it could be a potential game changer and significantly reduce the timelines for product evaluation, helping products ultimately reach patients faster. We also urge member states to adopt policy changes and provide the PQ program with the resources it needs to meet its growing scope and demands. Despite some of its constraints, the PQ program remains a key cog in the global health ecosystem and an important driver of improved product access. There are indications that WHO and other key stakeholders have realized that changes must be made, as the current structures are weighing down the program's ability to quickly facilitate access to critical technologies, especially novel products. By implementing changes to make the application and review process more user-friendly and efficient and the procedure itself more streamlined, we believe the program can better deliver on its mission to make high-quality essential medical products available to all who urgently need them.