A report from GHTC and Policy Cures Research examines how US federal funding for global health R&D is delivering impact both abroad and at home.

Search the GHTC website

New report confirms that US investments in global health research are paying off

Read time:

Did you know that Americans spend more money on ice cream in three weeks than the US Government spends on global health research and development (R&D) in a year? And despite this relatively modest investment in the creation of new global health tools, the United States is the worldwide leader in R&D for neglected diseases.

April 26, 2012 by Ashley Bennett

Did you know that Americans spend more money on ice cream in three weeks than the US Government spends on global health research and development (R&D) in a year? And despite this relatively modest investment in the creation of new global health tools, the United States is the worldwide leader in R&D for neglected diseases.

When we at the GHTC tell US policymakers the story of how global health R&D has revolutionized people’s lives around the world, we highlight the prominent role that the US Government plays in funding and supporting the development of new global health tools.

We’ve always believed that US leads the world in investment in global health R&D, and that this comparatively small investment has paid off many times over in lives and dollars saved.

We’ve seen the effectiveness of US-funded technologies like the polio vaccine, oral rehydration solution, and HIV and AIDS drugs. We’ve known that tools in the pipeline would have similar game-changing effects.

And now we have the evidence to prove it.

A new report, released today by the GHTC and Policy Cures, provides important confirmation that the US is the largest global health R&D funder in the world, investing $12.7 billion over the last decade.

A new report, released today by the GHTC and Policy Cures, provides important confirmation that the US is the largest global health R&D funder in the world, investing $12.7 billion over the last decade.

In fact, the US government in the last decade more than doubled its annual commitment to developing new global health products, from $685 million in 2000 to $1.4 billion in 2010. These investments represent just 0.01 percent of US gross domestic product.

Our report confirms the strong leadership role the US has played in the global health R&D landscape, and also includes new information on spending and support by key US federal agencies—the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Defense, US Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, and US Agency for International Development.

New information also details the public health impact of products already on the market, and new health and economic projections detail the possible impact for health tools still in development. There is an exciting pipeline of 365 new vaccines, drugs, diagnostic, and other products for global health, and the US Government is supporting 200 of them.

These are just a few examples of the immense impact of global health R&D, and the incredible benefits it will continue to have if robust support continues. The US is not alone in this effort—many governments around the globe, philanthropic foundations, and private industry partners provide large amounts of funding, technical expertise, and key intellectual property to develop new global health tools. The global health R&D landscape would not be the same without these important allies.

While the success of US investment in global health R&D is exceptional, the report makes clear that sustained and increased US support is essential to ensuring that the potential of global health research is not lost. The report provides recommendations for how the US Government can maximize its investments in new global health products. The recommendations are:

  • The US Government should maintain its funding for global health R&D, and increase this funding where possible.
  • The US Government needs to have a greater focus on the later stages of research and product development to fully leverage its global health R&D investments.
  • The US Government should increase funding to partnering mechanisms that are focused on translation of global health research.

With all of the amazing results of global health R&D we have seen—and with this new evidence that global health R&D is a worthwhile, cost-effective investment—it would be a shame to retreat now. With the US leadership role comes the responsibility to continue pushing the boundaries of science and leading the world in combating global health diseases.

Categories: DoD, FDA, NIH, USAID

About the author

Ashley BennettGHTC

Ashley Bennett is a Policy and Advocacy Officer at GHTC.

Other Breakthroughs Blog posts you may like:
PATH/Will Boase
April 30, 2012

Research Roundup: What we’re reading this week

Written by Kim Lufkin / GHTC
Read time:
In this regular feature on Breakthroughs, we highlight some of the most interesting reads in global health research from the past week. The National Institutes of Health has launched a new program that will pair researchers with certain pharmaceutical industry compounds to help scientists explore new treatment options for patients. The TuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative and GHTC member Aeras have announced a new memorandum of understanding to strengthen collaborative efforts to advance the world’s most promising tuberculosis vaccine candidates. The Senate Appropriations Committee has approved fiscal year (FY) 2013 budget legislation for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The bill would provide the FDA with $2.524 billion for FY 2013, which is $12.5 million more than the spending plan submitted in February by President Obama and $27.47 million more than the current fiscal year. The House Appropriations Committee has proposed reducing the State and Foreign Operations account by more than $5 billion for FY 2013. The State and Foreign Operations account—which saw an overall increase in President Obama’s budget request—funds the US Agency for International Development and the State Department, as well as programs such as the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
PATH/Aaron Joel Santos
April 25, 2012

What could you prove with $100,000?

Written by Michel Zaffran / PATH
Read time:
Michel Zaffran is the coordinator for the Expanded Programme on Immunization at the World Health Organization (WHO). He is also the director of Project Optimize at PATH. In this guest post, Zaffran writes about how the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is seeking new ideas for immunization systems and vaccine product characteristics. As one of the most cost-effective health interventions, new lifesaving vaccines bring great promise to communities around the world. However, these new vaccines often present challenges to the immunization supply systems of low- and middle-income countries. Some new vaccines can occupy more space, may be more complex to prepare for administration, and may have temperature requirements that are not suited to the challenging environment of low- and middle-income countries. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Grand Challenges Explorations grants program has launched a new call seeking ideas to improve immunization supply systems, including vaccine product characteristics that could have implications for research and development. For example: Tools to enable countries, donors, and procurement agencies to assess the systems costs and benefits of vaccine product presentations and formulations, rather than product price alone, in order to inform their vaccine purchase decisions and optimize their relevance to immunization strategies. Low-cost vial-level temperature indicators that display both cumulative and peak exposures to heat. Non-formulation means to prevent vaccines from freezing and/or to guarantee the sterility of opened multi-dose vials during storage and use. Any other innovation relevant to vaccine characteristics that do not necessarily involve preclinical or clinical research or improving vaccine stability or formulation. Anyone with a good idea is eligible to submit a two-page proposal, including public health specialists, researchers, entrepreneurs, engineers, or students working in nongovernmental organizations, ministries of health, universities, or companies. The program offers $100,000 grants, and successful projects may be eligible for additional funding up to $1 million. The submission deadline is May 15, 2012. This call for proposals builds on work facilitated by Project Optimize—a collaboration between PATH and the WHO—to develop a common vision for the future of immunization supply systems and logistics. More information Grand Challenges Explorations call for proposals Grand Challenges Explorations program Project Optimize on the PATH and WHO websites.